David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2006)
John McDowell's "minimal empiricism" is one of the most influential and widely discussed doctrines in contemporary philosophy. Richard Gaskin subjects it to careful examination and criticism, arguing that it has unacceptable consequences, and in particular that it mistakenly rules out something we all know to be the case: that infants and non-human animals experience a world. Gaskin traces the errors in McDowell's empiricism to their source, and presents his own, still more minimal, version of empiricism, suggesting that a correct philosophy of language requires us to recognize a sense in which the world we experience speaks its own language.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$28.51 used (71% off) $32.87 new (67% off) $97.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B1647.M144.G37 2006|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alice Crary (2012). Dogs and Concepts. Philosophy 87 (02):215-237.
T. H. Ho (2014). Naturalism and the Space of Reasons in Mind and World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):49-62.
Santiago Echeverri (2011). McDowell's Conceptualist Therapy for Skepticism. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):357-386.
Manuel García-Carpintero (2010). Gaskin's Ideal Unity. Dialectica 64 (2):279-88.
Yakir Levin (2015). Kant, McDowell, and the “Identity of Identity and Nonidentity”. Acta Analytica 30 (4):347-362.
Similar books and articles
A. Gupta (2006). Empiricism and Experience. Harvard University Press.
Hilan Bensusan & Manuel Pinedo-Garcia (2007). Minimal Empiricism Without Dogmas. Philosophia 35 (2):197-206.
J. Dodd (2007). Review: Experience and the World's Own Language: A Critique of John McDowell's Empiricism. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (464):1114-1119.
Joseph T. Rouse (2005). Mind, Body, and World: Todes and McDowell on Bodies and Language. Inquiry 48 (1):38-61.
Robert B. Brandom (2002). Non-Inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell's Empiricism. In Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. New York: Routledge
Jason Bridges (2007). Review of Richard Gaskin, Experience and the World's Own Language: A Critique of John McDowell's Empiricism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).
Steven Hendley (2010). Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's "Intramural" Debate. Theoria 76 (2):129-151.
Jesús Coll Mármol (2007). Conceptual Schemes and Empiricism: What Davidson Saw and McDowell Missed. Theoria 22 (2):153-165.
Michael Williams (2006). Science and Sensibility: McDowell and Sellars on Perceptual Experience. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):302–325.
Adrian Haddock (2009). Experience and the World's Own Language: A Critique of John McDowell's Empiricism, by Richard Gaskin. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):332-336.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #150,221 of 1,793,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #281,225 of 1,793,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?