Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):329-330 (2000)
|Abstract||I respond to Norris et al.'s criticism of Gaskell and Marslen- Wilson (1997). When the latter's network is tested in circumstances comparable to the Merge simulations in the target article, it produces the desired pattern of results. In another area of potential feedback in spoken word processing, aspects of lexical content influence word recognition and our network provides a simple explanation of why such effects emerge. It is unclear how such effects would be accommodated by Merge.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Louisa M. Slowiaczek (2000). Hesitations and Clarifications on a Model to Abandon Feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):347-347.
Paul A. Luce, Stephen D. Goldinger & Michael S. Vitevitch (2000). It's Good . . . But is It ART? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):336-336.
Timothy P. McNamara (2005). Semantic Priming: Perspectives From Memory and Word Recognition. Psychology Press.
Sid Kouider & Emmanuel Dupoux (2001). A Functional Disconnection Between Spoken and Visual Word Recognition: Evidence From Unconscious Priming. Cognition 82 (1):35- 49.
José R. Benkí (2000). Lexical Biases Are Useful. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
Matthew Brown & Derek Besner (2002). Semantic Priming: On the Role of Awareness in Visual Word Recognition in the Absence of an Expectancy. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (3):402-422.
William D. Marslen-Wilson (2000). What Phonetic Decision Making Does Not Tell Us About Lexical Architecture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):337-338.
Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Cutler (2000). Merging Information in Speech Recognition: Feedback is Never Necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):299-325.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?