Naturalising Austin

Acta Analytica 28 (3):329-343 (2013)
In this paper I will try to defend a quasi-naturalistic interpretation of J.L. Austin’s work. I will rely on P. Kitcher’s 1992 paper “The Naturalists Return” to compile four general criteria by which a philosopher can be called a naturalist. Then I will turn to Austin’s work and examine whether he meets these criteria. I will try to claim that versions of such naturalistic elements can be found in his work
Keywords J.L. Austin  Analytic–synthetic distinction  Naturalism  Evolution  P. Kitcher  Experimental philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-012-0173-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Andrew Munro (2013). Reading Austin Rhetorically. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Nat Hansen (2012). J. L. Austin and Literal Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):617-632.
John H. M. Austin (2003). Holcombe McCulloch Austin, 1909-2003. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76 (5):158 -.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #205,927 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.