Negative Translations Not Intuitionistically Equivalent to the Usual Ones

Studia Logica 101 (1):45-63 (2013)
Abstract
We refute the conjecture that all negative translations are intuitionistically equivalent by giving two counterexamples. Then we characterise the negative translations intuitionistically equivalent to the usual ones
Keywords Negative translation  Classical logic  Intuitionistic logic  Minimal logic  Negative fragment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,007
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
H. Ishihara (2000). A Note on the Godel-Gentzen Translation. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):135-138.
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
D. C. McCarty (1996). Undecidability and Intuitionistic Incompleteness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):559 - 565.
Andreja Prijatelj (1995). Reflections on “Difficult” Embeddings. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):71 - 84.
Mark Jago & Stephen Barker (2012). Being Positive About Negative Facts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
Daniel Colucciello Barber (2011). The Power of Nothingness: Negative Thought in Agamben. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (1):49-71.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-10-12

Total downloads

1 ( #438,988 of 1,101,181 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #290,806 of 1,101,181 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.