The Fables of Pity: Rousseau, Mandeville and the Animal-Fable

Derrida Today 5 (1):21-38 (2012)
Abstract
Prompted by Derrida's work on the animal-fable in eighteenth-century debates about political power, this article examines the role played by the fiction of the animal in thinking of pity as either a natural virtue (in Rousseau's Second Discourse) or as a natural passion (in Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees). The war of fables between Rousseau and Mandeville – and their hostile reception by Samuel Johnson and Adam Smith – reinforce that the animal-fable illustrates not so much the proper of man as the possibilities and limitations of a moral philosophy that is unable to address the political realities of the state
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
    Jacques Derrida (1998). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    View all 14 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Alex Voorhoeve (2002). Bernard Mandeville. The Philosophers' Magazine 20:53.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-04-26

    Total downloads

    12 ( #106,462 of 1,089,155 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,155 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.