The Fables of Pity: Rousseau, Mandeville and the Animal-Fable

Derrida Today 5 (1):21-38 (2012)
Abstract
Prompted by Derrida's work on the animal-fable in eighteenth-century debates about political power, this article examines the role played by the fiction of the animal in thinking of pity as either a natural virtue (in Rousseau's Second Discourse) or as a natural passion (in Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees). The war of fables between Rousseau and Mandeville – and their hostile reception by Samuel Johnson and Adam Smith – reinforce that the animal-fable illustrates not so much the proper of man as the possibilities and limitations of a moral philosophy that is unable to address the political realities of the state
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,337
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
Jacques Derrida (1998). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.

View all 14 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Alex Voorhoeve (2002). Bernard Mandeville. The Philosophers' Magazine 20:53.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-04-26

Total downloads

16 ( #98,517 of 1,096,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #71,259 of 1,096,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.