Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes's Conception of Inference
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Clarendon Press (1989)
This book deals with a neglected episode in the history of logic and theories of cognition: the way in which conceptions of inference changed during the seventeenth century. The author focuses on the work of Descartes, contrasting his construal of inference as an instantaneous grasp in accord with the natural light of reason, with the Aristotelian view of inference as a discursive process. Gaukroger offers a new interpretation of Descartes`s contribution to the question, revealing it to be a significant advance over humanist and late Scholastic conceptions. He argues that Descartes's account played a pivotal role in the development of our understanding of the nature of inference.
|Keywords||Descartes, René Inference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sinan Dogramaci (2013). Intuitions for Inferences. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):371-399.
Jan Dejnožka (2010). The Concept of Relevance and the Logic Diagram Tradition. Logica Universalis 4 (1):67-135.
D. Anthony Lariviere (2009). Cartesian Method and the Aristotelian-Scholastic Method. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):463-486.
Yaron Senderowicz (1998). Facing the Bounds of Tradition: Kant's Controversy with the Philosophisches Magazin. Science in Context 11 (2):205.
Similar books and articles
Jill Vance Buroker (1990). Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes's Conception of Inference. Philosophical Books 31 (3):143-144.
Andrea Christofidou (2009). Self and Self-Consciousness: Aristotelian Ontology and Cartesian Duality. Philosophical Investigations 32 (2):134-162.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
R. J. Butler (1972). Cartesian Studies. Oxford,B. Blackwell.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Indubitability. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Stephen Gaukroger (2002). Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Jerrold J. Katz (1986). Cogitations: A Study of the Cogito in Relation to the Philosophy of Logic and Language and a Study of Them in Relation to the Cogito. Oxford University Press.
Keith Frankish (2005). Non-Monotonic Inference. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
Stephen Gaukroger (1997). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Clarendon Press.
A. Raftopoulos (2003). Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
Daniel Garber (2001). Descartes Embodied: Reading Cartesian Philosophy Through Cartesian Science. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Slowik (1999). Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion. Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?