Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687 (2002)
|Abstract||Carruthers labels as “too strong” the thesis that language is necessary for all conceptual thought. Languageless creatures certainly do think, but when we get clear about what is meant by “conceptual thought,” it appears doubtful that conceptual thought is possible without language.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elisabeth Camp, Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence and the Generality Constraint.
Fei Xu (2002). Language and Conceptual Development: Words as Essence Placeholders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):704-705.
Olga Markic (2001). Is Language of Thought a Conceptual Necessity? Acta Analytica 16 (26):53-60.
Charles E. M. Dunlop (1990). Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought. Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
Gregory A. Bryant & Raymond W. Gibbs (2002). You Don't Say: Figurative Language and Thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):678-679.
Henry Jackman (2003). Expression, Thought, and Language. Philosophia 31 (1-2):33-54.
Javier de Lorenzo (1991). Leibniz-Frege, ¿Utopías de la Razón Conceptual? Theoria 6 (1):97-114.
Brian Loar (1982). Must Beliefs Be Sentences? Philosophy of Science Association 1982:627 - 643.
Christopher Gauker (2007). On the Alleged Priority of Thought Over Language. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads115 ( #5,917 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?