Graduate studies at Western
Medicine Studies 2 (4):265-278 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper analyses various approaches to the concept of a ‘safety culture’ in terms of their epistemological assumptions regarding the nature of learning. As a result of this analysis, the study proposes a relational-interpretive framework for the promotion of safety in health care, which is based on relational theories and the philosophy of conceptual pragmatism as this can be used to integrate the various strands of current safety research. In particular, the approach based on a relational-interpretive perspective can bridge the apparent dualist gap that exists between the rational objectivist perspective and the relativist perspective on the role of learning in developing a safety culture. According to the relational-interpretive perspective of safety management that is proposed here, organizational members need to give continuous attention to the accepted organizational norms and values, which shape the safety culture. A case study from a health care safety project in Sweden is utilized to illustrate the ideas advanced in this paper|
|Keywords||Safety culture Health care Learning Objectivism Relativism Pragmatism Relational theory Relational-interpretive perspective Deviant reporting systems Error reporting systems Incident reporting systems Case study|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wayne H. Stewart, Donna E. Ledgerwood & Ruth C. May (1996). Educating Business Schools About Safety & Health is No Accident. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):919 - 926.
Annette J. Browne, Colleen Varcoe, Victoria Smye, Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham, M. Judith Lynam & Sabrina Wong (2009). Cultural Safety and the Challenges of Translating Critically Oriented Knowledge in Practice. Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):167-179.
James A. E. Macpherson (2008). Safety, Risk Acceptability, and Morality. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Toby Seddon (2013). Regulating Health: Transcending Disciplinary Boundaries. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (1):43-53.
Christoph Kelp (2009). Knowledge and Safety. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:21-31.
Nick Turner & Sarah J. Tennant (2010). “As Far as is Reasonably Practicable”: Socially Constructing Risk, Safety, and Accidents in Military Operations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):21 - 33.
John Cantwell (2007). Reasoning With Safety Factor Rules. Techné 11 (1):55-70.
Barjinder Singh & Doan E. Winkel (2012). Racial Differences in Helping Behaviors: The Role of Respect, Safety, and Identification. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):467-477.
Dani Rabinowitz, &Quot;the Safety Condition for Knowledge&Quot;. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Marian A. Verkerk (2001). The Care Perspective and Autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):289-294.
Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). The FDA, Preemption, and Public Safety. Hastings Center Report 41 (5):11-12.
John Greco (2007). Worries About Pritchard's Safety. Synthese 158 (3):299 - 302.
Avram Hiller & Ram Neta (2007). Safety and Epistemic Luck. Synthese 158 (3):303 - 313.
Added to index2011-05-22
Total downloads8 ( #131,816 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?