Rivista di Estetica 34:181-198 (2007)
|Abstract||The question whether semantics is a normative discipline can be formulated as a question about the meaning of the word “means”. If I assert, “The word ‘gatto’ in Italian means cat,” what have I done? The naturalist about meaning claims that I have asserted that a certain natural relation obtains between Italian speakers’ tokens of “gatto” and cats. Or at least, I have asserted something about the way Italian speakers use the word “gatto”, which way presumably has something to do with cats. The normativist claims, on the contrary, that what I have said is that in speaking Italian one ought to use the word “gatto” in a certain way, which way has something to do with cats. What I have done is endorse a certain proposal about how to use the word, which, if accepted, will have normative force.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank C. Keil (2001). Good Intentions and Bad Words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1110-1111.
Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.) (1981). Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics. W. De Gruyter.
Pierrette Bouillon & Federica Busa (eds.) (2001). The Language of Word Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Nenad Smokrović (2002). Semantic Naturalism and Normativity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):71-81.
John F. Post (2006). Naturalism, Reduction and Normativity: Pressing From Below. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):1–27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads71 ( #14,619 of 722,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?