David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36 (2004)
We address three issues that might be important in evaluating the validity of the planning–control model: (1) It could be artificial to distinguish between control and planning when control involves the re-planning of a new corrective submovement that overlaps with the initial response; (2) experiments involving illusions are not totally compelling; (3) selectively implicating the superior parietal lobe in movement control and the basal ganglia in movement planning, appears questionable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scott Glover (2004). Planning and Control in Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):57-69.
Myrka Zago, Francesco Lacquaniti, Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer & Roberto Caminiti (2004). Planning and Control: Are They Separable in the Brain? Entia Non Sunt Multiplicanda Praeter Necessitatem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):56-57.
Judy S. DeLoache (2004). Scale Errors by Very Young Children: A Dissociation Between Action Planning and Control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):32-33.
David A. Westwood (2004). Planning, Control, and the Illusion of Explanation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55.
James G. Phillips, Thomas J. Triggs & James W. Meehan (2004). Planning and Control of Action as Solutions to an Independence of Visual Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):46-47.
Maurizio Gentilucci & Sergio Chieffi (2004). How Are Cognition and Movement Control Related to Each Other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):36-37.
David E. Vaillancourt, Mary A. Mayka & Daniel M. Corcos (2004). The Control Process is Represented in Both the Inferior and Superior Parietal Lobules. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):51-52.
Jos J. Adam & Ron F. Keulen (2004). FMRI Evidence for and Behavioral Evidence Against the Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24.
Scott Glover (2004). Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
P. Paolo Battaglini, Paolo Bernardis & Nicola Bruno (2004). At Least Some Electrophysiological and Behavioural Data Cannot Be Reconciled with the Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #232,907 of 1,792,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?