Graduate studies at Western
Foundations of Physics 41 (9):1462-1474 (2011)
|Abstract||For time-independent fields the Aharonov-Bohm effect has been obtained by idealizing the coordinate space as multiply-connected and using representations of its fundamental homotopy group to provide information on what is physically identified as the magnetic flux. With a time-dependent field, multiple-connectedness introduces the same degree of ambiguity; by taking into account electromagnetic fields induced by the time dependence, full physical behavior is again recovered once a representation is selected. The selection depends on a single arbitrary time (hence the so-called holonomies are not unique), although no physical effects depend on the value of that particular time. These features can also be phrased in terms of the selection of self-adjoint extensions, thereby involving yet another question that has come up in this context, namely, boundary conditions for the wave function.|
|Keywords||Aharonov-Bohm effect Time-dependence Homotopy Path integral Essential self-adjointness Gauge theory Vector potential Holonomies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tim Oliver Eynck, Holger Lyre & Nicolai von Rummell, A Versus B! Topological Nonseparability and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect.
Stephen Leeds (1999). Gauges: Aharonov, Bohm, Yang, Healey. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):606-627.
Tim Maudlin (1998). Healey on the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):361-368.
Richard Healey (1997). Nonlocality and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. Philosophy of Science 64 (1):18-41.
Antigone M. Nounou (2010). Holonomy Interpretation and Time: An Incompatible Match? A Critical Discussion of R. Healey's Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories. Erkenntnis 72 (3):387 - 409.
James Mattingly (2007). Classical Fields and Quantum Time-Evolution in the Aharonov–Bohm Effect. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (4):888-905.
Gordon Belot (1998). Understanding Electromagnetism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):531-555.
Chuang Liu (1994). The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Reality of Wave Packets. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):977-1000.
Antigone M. Nounou (2003). A Fourth Way to the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries In Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press.
Constantin Antonopoulos (1997). Time as Non-Observational Knowledge: How to Straighten Out Δeδt≥H. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):165 – 183.
Richard Healey (2004). Gauge Theories and Holisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):619-642.
Steven M. Rosen (1986). Time and Higher-Order Wholeness: A Response to David Bohm. In David Ray Griffin (ed.), Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time. State University of New York Press.
Yehudah Freundlich (1973). "Becoming" and the Asymmetries of Time. Philosophy of Science 40 (4):496-517.
Added to index2011-09-12
Total downloads39 ( #34,762 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #4,046 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?