International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):231 - 253 (2011)
|Abstract||Abstract In this Paper I interpret Charles S. Peirce?s method of prescision as a transcendental method. In order to do so, I argue that Peirce?s pragmatism can be interpreted in a transcendental light only if we use a non?justificatory understanding of transcendental philosophy. I show how Peirce?s prescision is similar to some abstracting procedure that Immanuel Kant used in his Critique of Pure Reason. Prescision abstracts from experience and thought in general those elements without which such experience and thought would be unaccountable. Similarly, in the Aesthetics, Kant isolated the a priori forms of intuition by showing how they could be abstracted from experience in general, while experience in general cannot be thought without them. However, if Peirce?s and Kant?s methods are similar in this respect, they reached very different conclusions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriele Gava (2011). Does Peirce Reject Transcendental Philosophy? Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2):195-221.
Avery Goldman (2002). The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
John R. Sachs (1992). Transcendental Method in Theology and the Normativity of Human Experience. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):213-225.
Gabriele Gava (2008). The Purposefulness in Our Thought: A Kantian Aid to Understanding Some Essential Features of Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 699-727.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). Affinity, Idealism and Naturalism: The Stability of Cinnabar and the Possibility of Experience. Kant-Studien 88 (2).
Jeffrey H. Sims (2008). A Fallible Groom in the Religious Thought of C.S. Peirce – a Centenary Revisitation. Sophia 47 (2).
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Jaime J. Marcio (2001). Thought Is Essentially An Action. Inquiry 21 (1):33-42.
Kenneth R. Merrill (1991). Hume's "of Miracles," Peirce, and the Balancing of Likelihoods. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):85 - 113.
Jerrold J. Abrams (2004). Peirce, Kant, and Apel on Transcendental Semiotics: The Unity of Apperception and the Deduction of the Categories of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):627 - 677.
Scott Stapleford (2006). Kant's Transcendental Arguments as Conceptual Proofs. Philosophical Papers 35 (1):119-136.
Derk Pereboom (1990). Kant on Justification in Transcendental Philosophy. Synthese 85 (1):25 - 54.
Michael Forest (2007). Peirce and Semiotic Foundationalism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):728 - 744.
M. C. Dillon (1987). Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.
Added to index2011-06-16
Total downloads16 ( #74,564 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?