David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 50:208-218 (1976)
The american philosopher william james has been accused of being both a positivist and a romantic intuitionist. in the present paper, i wish to defend james from both charges. first, an analysis of the james texts will indicate that: 1) he refuses to distinguish clearly sensation, percept and concept; 2) he recognizes the ontological status of concepts; and, 3) he uses the word "perceptual" in two different ways. this two-fold use of the word has been the source of much difficulty and forces us to deal, secondly, with the issue of james' opinion of language. he is often thought of as a romanticist, as someone who believed that life was beyond all language. we shall try to show that this view also is wrong, and that there exist two different views of language in his texts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
William J. Gavin (1976). William James on Language. International Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):81-86.
Graham Bird (1986). William James. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
P. William Bechtel (1978). Indeterminacy and Intentionality: Quine's Purported Elimination of Propositions. Journal of Philosophy 75 (November):649-661.
Günter Abel (1994). Indeterminacy and Interpretation. Inquiry 37 (4):403 – 419.
William J. Gavin (2009). Pragmatism and Death : Method Vs. Metaphor, Tragedy Vs. The Will to Believe. In John J. Stuhr (ed.), 100 Years of Pragmatism: William James's Revolutionary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
William James (1942). As William James Said: Extracts From the Published Writings of William James. New York, the Vanguard Press.
G. William Barnard (2005). Pt. 3. James and Mysticism. For an Engaged Reading : William James and the Varieties of Postmodern Religious Experience / Grace M. Jantzen ; Asian Religions and Mysticism : The Legacy of William James in the Study of Religions / Richard King ; James and Freud on Mysticism / Robert A. Segal ; Mystical Assessments : Jamesian Reflections on Spiritual Judgments. [REVIEW] In Jeremy R. Carrette (ed.), William James and the Varieties of Religious Experience: A Centenary Celebration. Routledge.
Jaime Nubiola (2000). Ludwig Wittgenstein and William James. Streams of William James 2 (3):2-4.
Jaime Nubiola (1999). Jorge Luis Borges and William James. Streams of William James 1 (3):7.
Jaime Nubiola (2001). William James and Borges Again: The Riddle of the Correspondence with Macedonio Fernández. Streams of William James 3 (2):10-11.
Roy Sorensen (1996). The Metaphysics of Words. Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):193 - 214.
Bertrand Russell (1992). William James's Conception of Truth. In William James & Doris Olin (eds.), William James: Pragmatism, in Focus. Routledge.
William J. Gavin (1979). James' Metaphysics: Language as the House Of ?Pure Experience? [REVIEW] Man and World 12 (2):142-159.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads3 ( #297,594 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?