Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):78-79 (2006)
|Abstract||The authors, on the basis of brief arguments, have dismissed tensor networks as a viable response to Jackendoff's challenges. However, there are reasons to believe that connectionist approaches descended from tensor networks are actually very well suited to answering Jackendoff's challenges. I rebut their arguments for dismissing tensor networks and briefly compare the approaches.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ralph D. Ellis (1996). Ray Jackendoff's Phenomenology of Language as a Refutation of the 'Appendage' Theory of Consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (1):125-137.
Andrew Brook (1996). Jackendoff and Consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (1):81-92.
Frank van der Velde & Marc de Kamps (2006). Neural Blackboard Architectures of Combinatorial Structures in Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):37-70.
David M. W. Powers (2006). On the Unproductiveness of Language and Linguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):82-84.
James Higginbotham (2003). Jackendoff's Conceptualism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):680-681.
Harry Howard (2003). Four Challenges for Cognitive Neuroscience and the Cortico-Hippocampal Division of Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):681-682.
Michael A. Arbib (2003). Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):668-669.
Steven Gross (2007). Reply to Jackendoff. The Linguistic Review 24 (4):423-429.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 732,277 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,277 )
How can I increase my downloads?