David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 49 (1):1 - 23 (2004)
Phaedo of Elis was well-known as a writer of Socratic dialogues, and it seems inconceivable that Plato could have been innocent of intertextuality when, excusing himself on the grounds of illness, he made him the narrator of one of his own: the "Phaedo". In fact the psychological model outlined by Socrates in this dialogue converges with the evidence we have (especially from fragments of the Zopyrus) for Phaedo's own beliefs about the soul. Specifically, Phaedo seems to have thought that non-rational desires were ineliminable epiphenomena of the body, that reason was something distinct, and that the purpose of philosophy was its 'cure' and 'purification'. If Plato's intention with the "Phaedo" is to assert the separability and immortality of reason (whatever one might think about desire and pleasure), then Phaedo provides a useful standpoint for him. In particular, Phaedo has arguments that are useful against the 'harmony-theorists' (and are the more useful rhetorically speaking since it is only over the independence of reason that Phaedo disagrees with them). At the same time as allying himself with Phaedo, however, Plato is able to improve on him by adding to the demonstration that reason is independent a proof that it is actually immortal
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
T. F. Morris (1984). The Proof of Pauline Self-Predication in the Phaedo. Philosophy Research Archives 10:139-151.
J. Tate (1957). Plato's Phaedo R. Hackforth: Plato's Phaedo. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Pp. 200. Cambridge: University Press, 1955. Cloth, 21s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 7 (01):26-29.
R. Rutherford (1997). Review. Plato, Phaedo. CJ Rowe. Socratic Rationalism and Political Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plato's Phaedo. The Classical Review 47 (2):274-277.
M. Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the "Phaedo". Phronesis 48 (2):89 - 115.
Plato & G. M. A. Grube (1976). Meno. Hackett Publishing.
Kristian Urstad, Pleasure in Plato's Phaedo. Philosophy Pathways.
Plato & G. M. A. Grube (1949). Meno. New York, Liberal Arts Press.
David Bostock (1986). Plato's Phaedo. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #43,537 of 1,692,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,120 of 1,692,471 )
How can I increase my downloads?