Sociology: an Infirm Science?: By Way of Introduction
Diogenes 38 (150):37-76 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesThomas F. Gieryn (2010). Paradigm for the Sociology of Science". In Craig J. Calhoun (ed.), Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. Columbia University Press.
Alan W. Richardson (2000). Science as Will and Representation: Carnap, Reichenbach, and the Sociology of Science. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):162.
Philip Kitcher (2000). Reviving the Sociology of Science. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):44.
Massimiano Bucchi (2004). Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. Routledge.
Craig J. Calhoun (ed.) (2010). Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. Columbia University Press.
David V. McQueen (1981). Sociology as a Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 12 (2):263-284.
Craig Calhoun (2010). Introduction: On Merton's Legacy and Contemporary Sociology. In Craig J. Calhoun (ed.), Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. Columbia University Press.
Giovanni Busino (forthcoming). Sociology: An Infirm Science. Diogenes:37-63.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
