The effects of music exposure and own genre preference on conscious and unconscious cognitive processes: A pilot ERP study
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):992-996 (2007)
Did Beethoven and Mozart have more in common with each other than Clapton and Hendrix? The current research demonstrated the widely reported Mozart Effect as only partly significant. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from 16 professional classical and rock musicians during a standard 2 stimulus visual oddball task, while listening to classical and rock music. During the oddball task participants were required to discriminate between an infrequent target stimulus randomly embedded in a train of repetitive background or standard stimuli. Consistent with previous research, the P3 and N2 ERPs were elicited in response to the infrequent target stimuli. Own genre preference resulted in a reduction in amplitude of the P3 for classical musicians exposed to classical music and rock musicians exposed to rock music. Notably, at the pre-attentive stage of processing beneficial effects of exposure to classical music were observed for both groups of musicians. These data are discussed in terms of short and long-term music benefits on both conscious and unconscious cognitive processes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Walter Verrusio, Evaristo Ettorre, Edoardo Vicenzini, Nicola Vanacore, Mauro Cacciafesta & Oriano Mecarelli (2015). The Mozart Effect: A Quantitative EEG Study. Consciousness and Cognition 35:150-155.
Similar books and articles
Gezinus Wolters & R. Hans Phaf (2002). Contrasts and Dissociations Suggest Qualitative Differences Between Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):359-360.
Ron Sun (2002). The Emergence of Consciousness: BUC Versus SOC. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356.
Tony Ro (2006). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Unconscious and Conscious Vision. In Haluk Ögmen & Bruno G. Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. MIT Press 335-352.
Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle (1990). On the Inter-Relatedness of Theory and Measurement in the Study of Unconscious Processes. Mind and Language 5 (1):9-28.
Troy A. W. Visser & Philip M. Merikle (1999). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: The Effects of Motivation. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):94-113.
Bruno G. Breitmeyer & Petra Stoerig (2006). Neural Correlates and Levels of Conscious and Unconscious Vision. In Haluk Ögmen & Bruno G. Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. MIT Press 35-48.
Martin Kurthen (2002). The Conscious and the Unconscious: A Package Deal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):343-344.
Fritz Strack & Roland Deutsch (2005). Reflection and Impulse as Determinants of Conscious and Unconscious Motivation. In Joseph P. Forgas, Kipling D. Williams & Simon M. Laham (eds.), Social Motivation: Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Cambridge University Press 91-112.
Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.) (2005). The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Hugo Bleichmar (2004). Making Conscious the Unconscious in Order to Modify Unconscious Processing: Some Mechanisms of Therapeutic Change. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85 (6):1379-1400.
Robert R. Hoffman (1997). What Neural Network Studies Suggest Regarding the Boundary Between Conscious and Unconscious Mental Processes. In Dan J. Stein (ed.), Cognitive Science and the Unconscious. American Psychiatric Press
Harald Höffding & Mary E. Lowndes (2004). The Conscious and the Unconscious: From Outlines of Psychology (1881). American Imago. Special Issue 1750 (3):379-395.
Martin Redington (2002). Associative Learning: A Generalisation Too Far. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):351-352.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads9 ( #291,000 of 1,780,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,056 of 1,780,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?