David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 41 (3-4):109- (1947)
The assumption that a particular object mentioned in the Iliad or Odyssey must be described by epithets which are consistent with each other and with the narrative has complicated every attempt to relate the evidence of archaeology to the poems. It may fairly be assumed that a modern writer wants to be consistent and that, apart from oversights, he will not use an epithet unless it is directly appropriate to the object which he is creating for his immediate purpose; but this is not necessarily true of a poet who had ready to hand a rich store of phrases in meaning appropriate to the various furnishings of his heroic world, and in form adapted to the needs of his verses. As within the Kunstsprache there is a group of epithets describing the moral and physical characteristics common to all heroes and used to suit not the race or actions of individuals but the scansion of their names and the place in the hexameter, so it is natural to suppose that descriptions of things in common use will include at least some similar stock phrases appropriate to types rather than to units. Once the existence of such phrases is established, there is no difficulty in their combination, as metrical convenience requires, in composite descriptions made up of elements each of which has its own real counterpart, but which need never all have existed together in the same object or even in the same age. The following tabulations of the descriptive words and phrases applied to a few familiar objects show that such metrical clausulae are always present, though they vary in prevalence and behaviour
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. E. Harvey (1957). Homeric Epithets in Greek Lyric Poetry. Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):206-.
Elizabeth S. Greene (2005). Revising Illegitimacy: The Use of Epithets in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Classical Quarterly 55 (02):343-349.
Adam M. Croom (2008). Racial Epithets: What We Say and Mean by Them. Dialogue 51:34-45.
Christopher Hom (2008). The Semantics of Racial Epithets. Journal of Philosophy 105 (8):416-440.
J. B. Hainsworth (1976). Blameless Aegisthus Anne Amory Parry: Blameless Aegisthus: A Study of ΑΜΜΩΝ and Other Homeric Epithets. (Mnemosyne Suppl. Xxvi). Pp. X + 292. Leiden: Brill, 1973. Paper, Fl.78. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (02):167-168.
Jonathan Foster (1977). Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid Robin R. Schlunk: The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Vergil. Pp. Xii + 144. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1974. Cloth, $8. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (01):22-23.
Pierre Pica (1995). Condition C and Epistemic Contexts : A Case Study of Epithets and Anti-Logophoricity Pronouns in French. In Young-Sun Kim, Byung-Choon Lee, Kyoung-Jae Lee, Kyun-Kwon Yang & Jong-Kuri Yoon (eds.), A Festchrift for Dong-Whee Yang. Hankuk Publishing
Mary Whitby (2000). M. D. Usher: Homeric Stitchings. The Homeric Centos of the Empress Eudocia . Pp. X + 173. Lanham, Etc.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998. Paper, £15.95. ISBN: 0-8476-9050-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):275-.
A. Shewan (1931). Homeric Proper and Place Names. A Supplement to A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect. By Richard John Cunliffe, LL.D. Pp. Vi+42. London and Glasgow: Blackie and Son, Ltd., 1931. Cloth, 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (06):243-.
M. M. Willcock (1970). The Homeric Formula J. B. Hainsworth: The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula. Pp. 147. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968. Cloth, 42s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (02):143-145.
Oliver Taplin (1980). Homeric Similes Carroll Moulton: Similes in the Homeric Poems. (Hypomnemata, 49). Pp. 163. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (02):183-184.
W. B. Stanford (1950). Homeric Studies Johannes Th. Kakridis: Homeric Researches.(Acta Reg. Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis, Vol. XLV.) Pp.Viii+168. Lund: Gleerup, 1949. Paper, Kr. 15. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (3-4):99-100.
Gilbert Murray (1936). Homeric Essays Alexander Shewan, M.A., LLD.: Homeric Essays. Pp. Ix+456; 1 Sketch-Map, 1 Photograph. Oxford: Blackwell, 1935. Cloth, 21s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):13-14.
Elizabeth Minchin (2007). Homeric Voices: Discourse, Memory, Gender. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads5 ( #541,493 of 1,938,443 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #119,296 of 1,938,443 )
How can I increase my downloads?