Graduate studies at Western
E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, J. Serepkaite, A. Cekanauskaite, L. Caenazzo, B. Gordijn, R. Pegoraro & E. Yuko
Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (6):351-355 (2012)
|Abstract||This article focuses on three scenarios in which residual biological materials are turned into research collections during the procedure of procuring these materials for diagnostic, therapeutic or other non-research purposes. These three scenarios differ from each other primarily because they employ different models of consent: (a) precautionary consent, which may be secured during the collecting procedure; (b) the presumed consent model, which may be applied during the collection of materials; and (c) consent for research use of identifiable human biological materials, which may be skipped entirely. These scenarios offer additional sources of biological samples for research purposes and at the same time seem to offer even more flexibility in terms of stringency of consent as compared with the more traditional models of broad consent in prospective research collections and the waiver of consent in retrospective research. Our discussion leads us to think that precautionary consent is preferable to presumed consent and no consent when handling issues of consent in the use of residual human biological materials for research. However, such precautionary consent should not be construed as blanket, unrestricted consent for any future use|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Howard Turtle (1995). Text Retrieval in the Legal World. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):5-54.
Gabriela Marodin, Paulo Henrique Condeixa de França, Jennifer Braathen Salgueiro, Marcia Luz da Motta, Gysélle Saddi Tannous & Anibal Gil Lopes (2012). Alternatives of Informed Consent for Storage and Use of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: Brazilian Regulation. Developing World Bioethics 12 (3).
Garrath Williams & Doris Schroeder (2004). Human Genetic Banking : Altruism, Benefit and Consent. New Genetics and Society 23 (1):89-103.
C. Trouet (2004). New European Guidelines for the Use of Stored Human Biological Materials in Biomedical Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):99-103.
Emanuel Bertrand & Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (2011). Materials Research in France: A Short-Lived National Initiative (1982–1994). Minerva 49 (2):191-214.
Sigrid Sterckx & Kristof van Assche (2011). The New Belgian Law on Biobanks: Some Comments From an Ethical Perspective. Health Care Analysis 19 (3):247-258.
Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) (2009). The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Paul Miller & Josephine Johnston (2008). Consent and Private Liability in Clinical Research. In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Rosamond Rhodes (2005). Rethinking Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):7 – 28.
Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer (2008). Beyond Consent : The Trust-Based Obligations of Physicians to Patients in Clinical Research. In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Alan Wertheimer (2010). Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens. Oxford University Press.
Søren Holm & Søren Madsen (2008). Informed Consent in Medical Research : A Procedure Stretched Beyond Breaking Point? In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Kathy Liddell (2008). Beyond a Rebarbative Commitment to Consent. In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara (2011). Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research. Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Atsushi Asai, Motoki Ohnishi, Etsuyo Nishigaki, Miho Sekimoto, Shunichi Fukuhara & Tsuguya Fukui (2002). Attitudes of the Japanese Public and Doctors Towards Use of Archived Information and Samples Without Informed Consent: Preliminary Findings Based on Focus Group Interviews. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-10.
Added to index2012-03-10
Total downloads5 ( #170,394 of 740,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?