Is teleological judgement (still) necessary? Kant's arguments in the analytic and in the dialectic of teleological judgement
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):533 – 566 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMiles Rind (2003). Kant's Beautiful Roses: A Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):65-74.
Aysel Doğan (2011). On the Priority of the Right to the Good. Kant-Studien 102 (3):316-334.
James Kreines (2008). The Logic of Life: Hegel's Philosophical Defense of Teleological Explanation of Living Beings. In James Kreines (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge Univ Pr.
James Kreines (2005). The Inexplicability of Kant's Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):270-311.
Immanuel Kant (1928). Kant's Critique of Teleological Judgement. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Rocque Reynolds (1999). Kant: The Audacity of Judgement. Res Publica 5 (1).
Rico Hauswald (2010). Umfangslogik Und Analytisches Urteil Bei Kant. Kant-Studien 101 (3):283-308.
Immanuel Kant (1892/2000). The Critique of Judgment. Prometheus Books.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-05-07Total downloads11 ( #99,611 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
