Art history, the problem of style, and Arnold Hauser's contribution to the history and sociology of knowledge
Graduate studies at Western
Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):121-142 (2012)
|Abstract||Much of Arnold Hauser’s work on the social history of art and the philosophy of art history is informed by a concern for the cognitive dimension of art. The present paper offers a reconstruction of this aspect of Hauser’s project and identifies areas of overlap with the sociology of knowledge—where the latter is to be understood as both a separate discipline and a going intellectual concern. Following a discussion of Hauser’s personal and intellectual background, as well as of the shifting political and academic setting of his work, the paper addresses one of Hauser’s central questions, viz. how best to square a thoroughgoing commitment to the social nature of art with the reality of successive artistic styles, given that the latter seem to be characterizable on purely formal grounds. This is followed by a discussion of Hauser’s conflicted views on the relation between art, science, and technology. This injects a tension into Hauser’s work, due to his initial reluctance to explain just how the aesthetic and the cognitive realms relate. The final part of the paper, through a closer examination of the analogies and disanalogies that Hauser sees between art history and the history of science, attempts to give a positive answer—“on Hauser’s behalf”, as it were—to the question of whether art may be credited with a specific cognitive dimension of its own, and if so, what its contribution to our cognitive enterprise may consist in|
|Keywords||Hauser Philosophy of art history Problem of style Sociology of knowledge Science and art|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arnold Hauser (1958/1959). The Philosophy of Art History. New York, Knopf.
Richard Lichtman (1960). Book Review:The Philosophy of Art History. Arnold Hauser. [REVIEW] Ethics 70 (4):333-.
Selmer Bringsjord (2000). Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (1):111-113.
Michelle K. Bolduc & David A. Frank (2010). Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's "On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation":On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation Commentary and Translation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):308-315.
Marc Hauser (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. Harper Collins.
Larry Hauser (1995). Doing Without Mentalese. Behavior And Philosophy 23 (2):42-47.
Larry Hauser (1995). Natural Language and Thought: Doing Without Mentalese. Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):41-47.
Risto Pitkänen (2010). Art and its History. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Keith Gunderson (1994). Movements, Actions, the Internal, & Hauser Robots. Behavior and Philosophy 22 (1):29 - 33.
Tiffany Sutton (2000). The Classification of Visual Art: A Philosophical Myth and its History. Cambridge University Press.
Larry Hauser (1994). Propositional Actitudes: Reply to Gunderson. Behavior and Philosophy 22 (1):35 - 40.
Robert Nelson (2007). The Spirit of Secular Art: A History of the Sacramental Roots of Contemporary Artistic Values. Monash University Epress.
Jonathan Gilmore (1995). David Carrier's Art History. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47.
Added to index2012-02-23
Total downloads12 ( #101,226 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,347 )
How can I increase my downloads?