“Cogitor ergo sum”: On the meaning and relevance of Baader's theological critique of Descartes

Modern Theology 21 (2):237-251 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the arguments on the basis of which Franz Baader , the almost forgotten contemporary of Hegel and Schelling, rejected Descartes’ philosophy so decisively, that, at the end of his life, he wrote to a friend that he passionately wanted to put an end to Cartesianism. I defend the thesis that Baader's hostility to Cartesianism was ultimately grounded in a theological idea, and that his holistic and emphatically Christian thought can only be adequately understood in the light of his critique of Descartes and Cartesianism. I also suggest reasons why Baader's work might well be considered as a source of inspiration for contemporary discussions of postmodernism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaning and relevance.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan Sperber.
Cartesian studies.Ronald Joseph Butler - 1972 - Oxford,: Blackwell.
Somnio Ergo Sum: Descartes's Three Dreams.W. T. Jones - 1980 - Philosophy and Literature 4 (2):145-162.
III. Zu René Descartes' „Cogito, ergo sum”.Johannes Dräseke - 1920 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 32 (1):48-55.
Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (review).Dennis Des Chene - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):113-115.
Cogito Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (review).Patrick Gerard Henry - 2002 - Philosophy and Literature 26 (2):465-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
43 (#361,277)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A paradigm of permeability: Franz von Baader on love.Joris Geldhof - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78 (1-2):91-105.

Add more citations