Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):272-286 (2011)
|Abstract||The present paper argues that ‘mature mathematical formalisms’ play a central role in achieving representation via scientific models. A close discussion of two contemporary accounts of how mathematical models apply—the DDI account (according to which representation depends on the successful interplay of denotation, demonstration and interpretation) and the ‘matching model’ account—reveals shortcomings of each, which, it is argued, suggests that scientific representation may be ineliminably heterogeneous in character. In order to achieve a degree of unification that is compatible with successful representation, scientists often rely on the existence of a ‘mature mathematical formalism’, where the latter refers to a—mathematically formulated and physically interpreted—notational system of locally applicable rules that derive from (but need not be reducible to) fundamental theory. As mathematical formalisms undergo a process of elaboration, enrichment, and entrenchment, they come to embody theoretical, ontological, and methodological commitments and assumptions. Since these are enshrined in the formalism itself, they are no longer readily obvious to either the novice or the proficient user. At the same time as formalisms constrain what may be represented, they also function as inferential and interpretative resources.|
|Keywords||Representation Denotation Mathematical formalism Inferential utility Scientific models|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adam Toon (2010). Models as Make-Believe. In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Representing Reality: The Ontology of Scientific Models and Their Representational Function. Dissertation, University of London
Steffen Ducheyne (2005). Lessons From Galileo: The Pragmatic Model of Shared Characteristics of Scientific Representation. Philosophia Naturalis 42 (2).
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Scientific Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 74 (1):48-68.
R. I. G. Hughes (1997). Models and Representation. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):336.
Otávio Bueno (2006). Representation at the Nanoscale. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):617-628.
Steven French (2003). A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don't Know Much About Art...But I Know It Involves Isomorphism). Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Xavier Donato Rodríguedez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2009). Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach. Erkenntnis 70 (1).
Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2009). Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 70 (1):101 - 118.
Axel Gelfert (2011). Model-Based Representation in Scientific Practice: New Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):251-252.
Roman Frigg (2006). Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories. Theoria 21 (1):49-65.
Added to index2011-06-11
Total downloads33 ( #41,878 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,779 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?