Science and Education (forthcoming)
|Abstract||Edgar Allan Poe’s standing as a literary figure, who drew on (and sometimes dabbled in) the scientific debates of his time, makes him an intriguing character for any exploration of the historical interrelationship between science, literature and philosophy. His sprawling ‘prose-poem’ Eureka (1848), in particular, has sometimes been scrutinized for anticipations of later scientific developments. By contrast, the present paper argues that it should be understood as a contribution to the raging debates about scientific methodology at the time. This methodological interest, which is echoed in Poe’s ‘tales of ratiocination’, gives rise to a proposed new mode of—broadly abductive—inference, which Poe attributes to the hybrid figure of the ‘poet-mathematician’. Without creative imagination and intuition, Science would necessarily remain incomplete, evenby its own standards. This concern with imaginative (abductive) inference ties in nicely with his coherentism, which grants pride of place to the twin virtues of Simplicity and Consistency, which must constrain imagination lest it degenerate into mere fancy.|
|Keywords||Edgar Allan Poe ratiocination inference abduction inductivism Samuel Taylor Coleridge|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Swirski (2000). Between Literature and Science: Poe, Lem, and Explorations in Aesthetics, Cognitive Science, and Literary Knowledge. Liverpool University Press.
Charles J. Gallagher (1943). Edgar Allan Poe. Thought 18 (1):155-157.
Krishna Rayan (1969). Edgar Allan Poe and Suggestiveness. British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (1):73-79.
Ariel Rubinstein & Kfir Eliaz, Edgar Allan Poe's Riddle: Do Guessers Outperform Misleaders in a Repeated Matching Pennies Game?
Christopher Peterson (2013). Bestial Traces: Race, Sexuality, Animality. Fordham University Press.
Anya Plutynski (2011). Four Problems of Abduction: A Brief History. HOPOS 1 (2):227-248.
Danielle Poe (2008). Replacing Just War Theory with an Ethics of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 33-47.
Roberta Imboden (1997). The Minimal Text of Edgar Allan Poe's Raven. Symposium 1 (1):17-23.
Daniel G. Campos (forthcoming). On the Distinction Between Peirce's Abduction and Lipton's Inference to the Best Explanation. Synthese.
James Blachowicz (1996). Ampliative Abduction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):141 – 157.
Andrew Smith (2000). Gothic Radicalism: Literature, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis in the Nineteenth Century. St. Martin's Press.
Sami Paavola (2004). Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: The Importance of Strategies. Foundations of Science 9 (3):267-283.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1999). Defending Abduction. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):451.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-13
Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?