The desired moral attitude of the physician: (III) care [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):125-139 (2013)
In professional medical ethics, the physician traditionally is obliged to fulfil specific duties as well as to embody a responsible and trustworthy personality. In the public discussion, different concepts are suggested to describe the desired moral attitude of physicians. In a series of three articles, three of the discussed concepts are presented in an interpretation that is meant to characterise the morally emotional part of this attitude: “empathy”, “compassion” and “care”. In the first article of the series, “empathy” has been developed as a mainly cognitive and morally neutral capacity of understanding. In the second article, the emotional and virtuous core of the desired professional attitude—compassion—has been presented. Compassion as a professional attitude has been distinguished from a spontaneous feeling of compassion, and has been related to a general idea of man as vulnerable and solidary being. Thus, the dignity of the patient is safeguarded in spite of the asymmetry of compassion. In this article, the third concept of the triad—“care”—is presented. Care is conceived as an attitude as well as an activity which can be directed to different objects: if it is directed to another sentient being, it is regarded as intrinsically morally valuable; implying (1) the acceptance of being addressed, (2) a benevolent inclination to help and to foster, and (3) activity to realize this. There are different forms of benevolence that can underlie caring. With regard to the professional physician’s ethos, the attitude of empathic compassion as developed in the two previous articles is proposed to be the adequate underlying attitude of care which demands the right balance between closeness and professionalism and the right form of attention to the person of the patient. ‘Empathic compassionate care’ does not, however, describe the whole of the desired attitude of a physician, but focuses on the morally-emotive aspects. In order to get also the cognitive and practical aspects of biomedicine into the picture, ‘empathic compassionate care’ has to be combined with an attitude of responsibility that is more directed to decision-making and outcome than a caring attitude alone can be. The reconstruction of the desired professional attitude in terms of “empathic compassionate care” and “responsibility” is certainly not the only possible description, but it is a detailed proposal in order to give an impulse for the discussion about the inner tacit values and the meaning of medicine and clinical healthcare professions
|Keywords||Clinical ethics Empathy Compassion Care Virtue ethics Moral motivation Professionalism Moral attitude|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2006). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Alisa L. Carse (1998). Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2):153 – 169.
Alisa L. Carse & Hilde Lindemann Nelson (1996). Rehabilitating Care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):19-35.
Eric J. Cassell (2004). The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Petra Gelhaus (2012). The Desired Moral Attitude of the Physician: (II) Compassion. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):397-410.
Petra Gelhaus (2012). The Desired Moral Attitude of the Physician: (I) Empathy. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):103-113.
Margreet van der Cingel (2009). Compassion and Professional Care: Exploring the Domain. Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):124-136.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1997). Managed Care at the Bedside: How Do We Look in the Moral Mirror? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):321-330.
Keith Bauer (2004). Cybermedicine and the Moral Integrity of the Physician–Patient Relationship. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):83-91.
Halvor Nordby (2009). Foundations of Health Care: Ethical Dilemmas and Communicative Challenges. Unipub.
Muriel R. Gillick (2012). Doing the Right Thing: A Geriatrician's Perspective on Medical Care for the Person with Advanced Dementia. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):51-56.
Tamler Sommers (2007). The Objective Attitude. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):321–341.
L. W. Ekstrom (2012). Liars, Medicine, and Compassion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (2):159-180.
F. Cheng, Mary Ip, K. K. Wong & W. W. Yan (1998). Critical Care Ethics in Hong Kong: Cross-Cultural Conflicts as East Meets West. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):616 – 627.
Andrea Staiti (2009). Systematische Überlegungen Zu Husserls Einstellungslehre. Husserl Studies 25 (3):219-233.
Dario Sacchini & Leonardo Antico (2000). The Professional Autonomy of the Medical Doctor in Italy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):441-456.
Laurence B. McCullough (2004). The Nature and Limits of the Physician's Professional Responsibilities: Surgical Ethics, Matters of Conscience, and Managed Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):3 – 9.
Added to index2012-01-24
Total downloads11 ( #138,532 of 1,102,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,833 of 1,102,740 )
How can I increase my downloads?