David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):51-64 (2009)
Analogy, as the connection of similar things, is present in all fields of human thought. Art uses verbal (in poetry, literature, art criticism) and optical analogies(in the visual arts), aiming at an emotional perception and interpretation of the world. Philosophy and the sciences also use largely analogical applications, as ameans to construct intuitionally understandable theories. In Law the analogical application of laws is an efficient way to regulate social conflicts. The risk,however, of cognitive distortions, by transferring inadequately explanatory models to other fields, created doubts about the rational appropriateness of suchmethodological tools. Applications of analogical thinking in different domains are readily comprehensible, if the role of analogies in each of them is analysed. Thedifferent aims of science, philosophy and art imply different similarity-criteria to support the transfer of linguistic and visual expressions in regions to which theydo not have a direct connection and application
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary S. Morgan (1997). The Technology of Analogical Models: Irving Fisher's Monetary Worlds. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):314.
Dirk Schlimm (2008). Two Ways of Analogy: Extending the Study of Analogies to Mathematical Domains. Philosophy of Science 75 (2):178-200.
Yves Gingras & Alexandre Guay (2011). The Uses of Analogies in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Science. Perspectives on Science 19 (2):154-191.
Paul F. A. Bartha (2010). By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. Oxford University Press.
Peter Achinstein (1964). Models, Analogies, and Theories. Philosophy of Science 31 (4):328-350.
Jeffrey Koperski, Models. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
R. C. Paton, H. S. Nwana, M. J. R. Shave & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (1994). An Examination of Some Metaphorical Contexts for Biologically Motivated Computing. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):505-525.
John Woods & Brent Hudak (1992). Verdi is the Puccini of Music. Synthese 92 (2):189 - 220.
Peter Kroes (1989). Structural Analogies Between Physical Systems. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):145-154.
Lindley Darden (1982). Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:147 - 165.
Lyn D. English (ed.) (1997). Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Paul Thagard & Craig Beam (2004). Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):504-516.
L. Ypi (2012). Public Spaces and the End of Art. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (8):843-860.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads11 ( #300,845 of 1,792,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,717 of 1,792,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?