Philosophy 33 (124):1- (1958)
|Abstract||I will begin by stating three theses which I present in this paper. The first is that it is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking. The second is that the concepts of obligation, and duty Ã¢â¬â moral obligation and moral duty, that is to say Ã¢â¬â and of what is morally right and wrong, and of the moral sense of "ought," ought..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew J. Dell’Olio (1998). God, the Self, and the Ethics of Virtue. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):47-70.
Richard A. Blanke (1985). The Motivation to Be Moral in the Groundwork to the Metaphysics of Morals. Philosophy Research Archives 11:335-345.
Liezl van Zyl (2009). Accidental Rightness. Philosophia 37 (1):91-104.
Arthur J. Dyck (1973). A Unified Theory of Virtue and Obligation. Journal of Religious Ethics 1:37 - 52.
Hugo Adam Bedau (1971). Military Service and Moral Obligation. Inquiry 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
William L. Langenfus (1988). A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism. Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
J. B. Schneewind (2010). Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Charles Pigden (1988). Anscombe on `Ought'. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):20-41.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads269 ( #605 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #1,358 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?