Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19 (1958)
|Abstract||The author presents and defends three theses: (1) "the first is that it is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology." (2) "the second is that the concepts of obligation, And duty... And of what is morally right and wrong, And of the moral sense of 'ought', Ought to be jettisoned if this is psychologically possible...." (3) "the third thesis is that the differences between the well-Known english writers on moral philosophy from sidgwick to the present day are of little importance." (staff)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew J. Dell’Olio (1998). God, the Self, and the Ethics of Virtue. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):47-70.
Richard A. Blanke (1985). The Motivation to Be Moral in the Groundwork to the Metaphysics of Morals. Philosophy Research Archives 11:335-345.
Liezl van Zyl (2009). Accidental Rightness. Philosophia 37 (1):91-104.
Arthur J. Dyck (1973). A Unified Theory of Virtue and Obligation. Journal of Religious Ethics 1:37 - 52.
Hugo Adam Bedau (1971). Military Service and Moral Obligation. Inquiry 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
William L. Langenfus (1988). A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism. Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
J. B. Schneewind (2010). Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Charles Pigden (1988). Anscombe on `Ought'. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):20-41.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads305 ( #583 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)37 ( #2,836 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?