Crossing and dipping: Some terms for approaching the interface between natural understanding and logical formulation [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 5 (4):547-560 (1995)
Gendlin proposes experiential concepts as bridges between phenomenology and logical formulation. His method moves back and forth, aiming to increase both natural understanding and logical formulation. On thesubjective side, the concepts requiredirect reference tofelt orimplicit meaning. There is no equivalence between this and the logical side. Rather, in logical explication, the implicit iscarried forward, a relation shown by many functions. The subjective is no inner parallel. It performsspecific functions in language. Once these are located, they also lead to developments on the formulated side.To show some of this, Gendlin modifies Lakoff and Johnson''s theory of metaphor, and expands it into a theory of all language use. He denies that a metaphor consists of a pattern or image, shared by two situations. There is only one situation — the metaphoric one. The original situation is actually a family of many uses (in the Wittgensteinian sense). As in all speech, a word makes sense only as its use-family crosses with an actual situation in the actual spot in a sentence. Subjectively, a metaphor means this crossing. From it, long chains of new similarities and differences can be generated. Ways to study the functions and features of thiscrossing are proposed.
|Keywords||Metaphor Wittgenstein natural language focusing implicit artificial intelligence explication phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mikael Rask & David Brunt (2007). Verbal and Social Interactions in the Nurse?Patient Relationship in Forensic Psychiatric Nursing Care: A Model and its Philosophical and Theoretical Foundation. Nursing Inquiry 14 (2):169-176.
Similar books and articles
Roger Penrose (1997). On Understanding Understanding. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):7 – 20.
R. E. Jennings (1994). The Genealogy of Disjunction. Oxford University Press.
Aaron Sloman, Two Notions Contrasted: 'Logical Geography' and 'Logical Topography' Variations on a Theme by Gilbert Ryle: The Logical Topography of 'Logical Geography'.
Otávio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (2009). Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind 118 (470):295-321.
Reinhard Muskens (2001). Talking About Trees and Truth-Conditions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (4):417-455.
Reinhard Muskens (1991). [Book Chapter]. Springer Netherlands.
Corine Besson, Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication (2010).
Christopher Menzel (1998). Logical Form. In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
George Lakoff (1970). Linguistics and Natural Logic. Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #148,863 of 1,096,509 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #238,630 of 1,096,509 )
How can I increase my downloads?