Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669 (2001)
|Abstract||Tenenbaum and Griffiths' paper attempts to subsume theories of similarity – including spatial models, featural models, and structure-mapping models – into a framework based on Bayesian generalization. But in so doing it misses significant phenomena of comparison. It would be more fruitful to examine how comparison processes suggest hypotheses than to try to derive similarity from Bayesian reasoning. [Shepard; Tenenbaum & Griffiths].|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard L. Lewis (1999). Accounting for the Fine Structure of Syntactic Working Memory: Similarity-Based Interference as a Unifying Principle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):105-106.
Oscar Vilarroya (2005). In Search of Radical Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Gary Marcus (2005). Opposites Detract: Why Rules and Similarity Should Not Be Viewed as Opposite Ends of a Continuum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2005). The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Benjamin Stone, Simon Dennis & Peter J. Kwantes (2011). Comparing Methods for Single Paragraph Similarity Analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (1):92-122.
David Dowe & Graham Oppy (2001). Universal Bayesian Inference? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths (2001). Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2001). Context Effects Equally Applicable in Generalization and Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):699-700.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,976 of 738,633 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?