Recensioni/Reviews-Conceivability and Possibility [Book Review]

Epistemologia 28 (2) (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Conceivability and possibility.Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne - 2002 - In T. Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--70.
Conceivability and Possibility.Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conceivability, Possibility and Rationality.Karol Polcyn - 2013 - Filozofia Nauki 21 (2).
Conceivability, possibility, and a posteriori necessity: On Chalmers' argument for dualism.Karol Polcyn - 2006 - Diametros 7:37-55.
Conceivability, Explanation, and Defeat.Gordon Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (3):327 - 338.
Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
Conceivability, rigidity and counterpossibles.Jesper Kallestrup - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):377 - 386.
Note on conceivability and logical possibility.Tibor R. Machan - 1969 - Kinesis 2:39--42.
Imaginability, conceivability, possibility and the mind-body problem.Christopher S. Hill - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 87 (1):61-85.
Conceivability and modality in Hume: A lemma in an argument in defense of skeptical realism.Peter Kail - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):43--61.
Meta-conceivability.Philip Corkum - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):12.
Possibility and conceivability: A response-dependent account of their connections.Peter Menzies - 1998 - In Roberto Casati (ed.), European Review of Philosophy, Volume 3: Response-Dependence. Stanford: Csli Publications. pp. 255--277.
David Chalmers’ Argument for the Logical Possibility of Zombies.Jacek Jarocki - 2013 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 61 (1):23-42.
Why positive and negative conceivability can't save the conceivability-possibility link.Matthew Phillips - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tamar Gendler
Yale University
John Hawthorne
Australian Catholic University
Elisa Paganini
Università degli Studi di Milano

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references