Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases
Garland Pub. (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Thought experiments | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $143.48 new (19% off) $175.00 direct from Amazon $183.15 used Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | BD265.G46 2000 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 081533656X | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBoris Grozdanoff (2007). Reconstruction, Justification and Incompatibility in Norton's Account of Thought Experiments. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):69-79.
Marek Picha (2011). How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment. Organon F 18 (2):154-188.
Tamar Szabó Gendler (1998). Galileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):397-424.
Elke Brendel (2004). Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments. Dialectica 58 (1):89–108.
Michael A. Bishop (1999). Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Lawrence Souder (2003). What Are We to Think About Thought Experiments? Argumentation 17 (2):203-217.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
