The question of rigidity in new theories of reference
Noûs 37 (1):161–179 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen P. Schwartz (2002). Kinds, General Terms, and Rigidity: A Reply to LaPorte. Philosophical Studies 109 (3):265 - 277.
Genoveva Marti (2002). Review of Scott Soames, Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (12).
Jussi Jylkkä (2008). Theories of Natural Kind Term Reference and Empirical Psychology. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):153-169.
Corine Besson (2010). Rigidity, Natural Kind Terms, and Metasemantics. In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge.
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Proto-Rigidity. Synthese 150 (2):155 - 169.
Genoveva Martí (1998). Rigidity and the Description of Counterfactual Situations. Theoria 13 (3):477-490.
Genoveva Martí (1998). Rigidity and the Description of Counterfactual Situations. Theoria 13 (3):477-490.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads54 ( #18,771 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
