The real guide to fake Barns: A catalogue of gifts for your epistemic enemies
Philosophical Studies 124 (3):331-352 (2005)
| Abstract | Perhaps the concept of knowledge, prior to its being fashioned and molded by certain philosophical traditions, never offered any stable negative verdict in the original fake barn case. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTamar Szabó Gendler (2011). On the Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias. Philosophical Studies 156 (1):33-63.
E. G. Turner (1960). A Booklover's Papyri B. R. Rees, H. I. Bell, J. W. B. Barns: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Greek Papyri in the Collection of Wilfred Merton. Volume Ii. Pp. Xiv+209; 46 Collotype Plates. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis & Co., 1959. Cloth, £8. 8s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (03):215-217.
Jeffrey T. Berger (2003). Pharmaceutical Industry Influences on Physician Prescribing: Gifts, Quasi-Gifts, and Patient-Directed Gifts. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):56-57.
Don Fallis (2005). Epistemic Value Theory and Social Epistemology. Episteme 2 (3):177-188.
Agnes Heller (2001). The Fake as Joke, Sabotage, Business, and Paradigm: On Sandor Radnoti's the Fake. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 23 (1):181-189.
Hong LI & Donghui HAN (2007). What is "the Ineffable" Exactly? An Extensive Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402 - 411.
Hong Li & Donghui Han (2007). What is “the Ineffable” Exactly? Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402-411.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads171 ( #1,877 of 549,080 )Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #6,811 of 549,080 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
