David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 43 (01):1- (1993)
Aeschylus' account of the sacrifice of Iphigeneia in the Agamemnon has elicited an extraordinarily wide range of interpretations–a critical response which, in its veryproductivity, may signal a central aspect of the description itself. While more recent explications have been profitably informed by research in cult and ritual, there remains, I would like to suggest, an important literary possibility which merits consideration, particularly in a text where so much has been shaped from a close and profound engagement with the Homeric tradition. The description of the sacrifice is forcefully carried by enjambement from one stanza into another by the sheer weight, as it were, of the force that crushingly silences, βίαι χαλινν τ᾿ άναύδωι μνει . In the midst of much that is dark and difficult to construe, the composition yields a sudden effusion of colour, a striking trail of saffron. The sense of concealment, of a figure enveloped or enshrouded, which has been suggested by the phrase πέπλοισι περιπετή , opens on to an image of unfolding, the falling spread of a robe caught in itsflow towards the ground, κρόκου βαφάς δ ς πέδονχέουσα
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Heath (1999). The Serpent and the Sparrows: Homer and the Parodos of Aeschylus' Agamemnon. Classical Quarterly 49 (02):396-.
W. R. Paton (1921). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Rushworth Kennard Davis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1919. 4s. 6d Net. The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Gilbert Murray. London: Allen and Unwin, 1920. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (5-6):107-108.
R. P. Winnington-Ingram (1959). The Agamemnon (1) J. D. Denniston and Denys Page: Aeschylus, Agamemnon. Pp. Xxxix + 240. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957. Cloth, 21s. Net. (2) Eduard Fraenkel: Der Agamemnon des Aeschylus. Pp. 38. Zürich: Artemis-Verlag, 1957. Paper, 3.80 Sw. Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (01):23-26.
H. J. Rose (1950). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus Sir Frank Fletcher: Notes to the Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Pp. 79. Oxford: Blackwell, 1949. Paper, 4s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (3-4):105-106.
M. L. West (1979). The Parodos of the Agamemnon. Classical Quarterly 29 (01):1-.
Peter Gainsford (2005). Agamemnon P. De May (Trans.): Aeschylus: Agamemnon. Pp. X + 133, Map, Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Paper, £4.95. ISBN: 0-521-01075-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):16-.
H. L. Lommer (1932). A New Text of the Agamemnon Aeschylus: The Agamemnon. A Revised Text with Introduction, Verse Translation, and Critical Notes. By J. C. Lawson. Pp. Xlviii+168. Cambridge: University Press, 1932. Cloth, 15s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (04):161-163.
A. M. Dale (1936). Prometheus and Agamemnon in English Prose The Agamemnon of Aeschylus, Translated by T. G. Tucker, C.M.G., Litt.D. Pp. 63. The Prometheus Bound, Translated by the Same. Pp. 49. Melbourne: University Press (London, Milford), 1935. Cloth, 3s. 6d. Each. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):16-17.
R. P. Winnington-Ingram (1951). Fraenkel's Agamemnon Aeschylus: Agamemnon. Edited With A Commentary By Eduard Fraenkel. 3 Vols. Vol. I, Pp. Xvi + 195; Vols. II and III, Pp. Viii + 850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950. Cloth, £4. 4s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (3-4):147-151.
J. U. Powell (1904). Verrall's Agamemnon (Ed. 2) The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. With an Introduction, Commentary, and Translalation, by A. W. Verrall, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, Hon. Litt.D. In the University of Dublin. London: Macmillan & Co., 1904. Second Edition. Pp. Lxii. + 252. 12s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (4):212-215.
P. J. Finglass (2012). The Agamemnon Raeburn, Thomas The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. A Commentary for Students. Pp. Lxxiv + 289, Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Paper, £29.99, US$55 . ISBN: 978-0-19-959561-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (2):370-372.
Eduard Fraenkel (1937). A New Text of the Agamemnon The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. A Revised Text with Brief Critical Notes by A. Y. Campbell, Professor of Greek in the University of Liverpool. Pp. Xxiii + 126. London: Hodder and Stoughton (University Press of Liverpool), 1936. Cloth, 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (02):59-64.
A. W. Pickard-Cambridge (1940). Campbell's Agamemnon in English A. Y. Campbell: The Agamemnon of Aeschylus, Translated Into English Verse, with an Introduction and Explanatory Notes, and an Appendix of New Notes on the Text. Pp. Xxii+95. University Press of Liverpool, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1940. Cloth, 3s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):82-84.
J. F. Gannon (1989). Aeschylus, Agamemnon 72–5. Classical Quarterly 39 (01):254-.
T. L. Agar (1924). Aeschylus, Agamemnon 1–8. Classical Quarterly 18 (3-4):163-.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?