David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):75 - 99 (2003)
Widely regarded as the most influential proponent of the truth of original sin in the twentieth century, Reinhold Niebuhr worked hard to excise any "literalistic" element from his interpretation of the doctrine. In his attempt to "correct" the Augustinian tradition on original sin by purging it of all "literalistic errors," however, Niebuhr assumed as his starting point the most characteristically modern objection to the doctrine: that birth is a thoroughly natural, animal, and morally meaningless event. As a result, Niebuhr unnecessarily constrained his vision of the dimensions of human freedom, and hence his description of the dynamic of anxiety and freedom that energizes sin. Through a careful reading of Reinhold Niebuhr's writings on original sin, in light of the truth that the end of human life is inseparable from its origins, a reappraisal and recovery of the meaningfulness of the assertion of original sin as a literal inheritance is possible. The result of such a reappraisal and recovery is an amplified insight into the existential anxiety that Niebuhr otherwise described so convincingly
|Keywords||Reinhold Niebuhr literalism Augustine original sin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Iver Kaufman (2010). Christian Realism and Augustinian (?) Liberalism. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):699-724.
Similar books and articles
Daniel James Malotky (2003). Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Groundwork for Social Responsibility. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):121-123.
Michael Rea (2007). The Metaphysics of Original Sin. In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Persons: Human and Divine. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ;. 319--356.
Brent W. Sockness (1992). Luther's Two Kingdoms Revisited: A Response to Reinhold Niebuhr's Criticism of Luther. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):93 - 110.
Khurram Hussain (2010). Tragedy and History in Reinhold Niebuhr's Thought. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (2):147-159.
Peter Kennealy (1985). History, Politics, and the Sense of Sin : The Case of Reinhold Niebuhr. In Athanasios Moulakis (ed.), The Promise of History: Essays in Political Philosophy. W. De Gruyter.
Dennis P. McCann (1980). Hermeneutics and Ethics: The Example of Reinhold Niebuhr. Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):27 - 53.
Simon Heans (2013). Original Sin or Original Sinfulness? A Comment. Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69.
Robin Lovin (2003). Review: Reinhold Niebuhr in Contemporary Scholarship: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (3):487 - 505.
James Stillwaggon (2014). The Problem of Propagation: Original Sin as Inherited Discourse. Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):61-73.
W. Glenn Kirkconnell (2010). Kierkegaard on Sin and Salvation: From Philosophical Fragments Through the Two Ages. Continuum.
James Wetzel (1995). Moral Personality, Perversity, and Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):3 - 25.
W. Paul Franks (2012). Original Sin and a Broad Free Will Defense. Philosophia Christi 14 (2):353–371.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads19 ( #90,396 of 1,103,039 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,017 of 1,103,039 )
How can I increase my downloads?