The Role of the 'International Community' in Just War Tradition--Confronting the Challenges of Humanitarian Intervention and Preemptive War
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Military Ethics 2 (2):122-144 (2003)
Although the use of military force for humanitarian ends seems utterly divorced from the use of such force to combat terrorism, both uses answer to similar descriptions. Both appear to encourage nations that are not necessarily themselves under attack to set aside the reigning conventions of national sovereignty and territorial integrity for the overriding purposes of international law enforcement and protection of vulnerable noncombatants. Both involve offensive rather than purely defensive uses of military force. Both answer to criteria of justification that can be derived more readily from the normative moral principles of the classical just war tradition than from purely descriptive revisions of the 'legalist paradigm' in international relations, because the latter is deeply wedded by precedent to notions of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and a purely defensive use of military force. Most significantly, the justification for both kinds of military action depends essentially upon a notion of 'the international community' that is inchoate and urgently in need of rigorous reformulation. In this paper, I attempt to formulate criteria for the justifiable use of military force for these non-defensive purposes, with attention to the nuances of internationalism that several of the resulting criteria entail. Challenges to the de facto role of the United Nations as the sole authoritative representative of this community, and alternatives to its authority in legitimating the use of military force for purposes of international law enforcement, are considered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Davis Brown (2011). Judging the Judges: Evaluating Challenges to Proper Authority in Just War Theory. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):133-147.
Similar books and articles
Alex J. Bellamy (2006). Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq. Polity Press.
Sean D. Murphy (2013). Jus Ad Bellum, Values, and the Contemporary Structure of International Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):20-26.
Rodney G. Peffer (2008). The U.S. War in Iraq, Just War Theory and Neoconservatism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:115-151.
A. Walter Dorn (2011). The Just War Index: Comparing Warfighting and Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):242-262.
Davis Brown (2011). Introduction: The Just War Tradition and the Continuing Challenges to World Public Order. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):125-132.
James Turner Johnson (2008). The Idea of Defense in Historical and Contemporary Thinking About Just War. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):543-556.
Henry Shue & David Rodin (eds.) (2009). Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. OUP Oxford.
Jerome Singh (2003). American Physicians and Dual Loyalty Obligations in the "War on Terror". BMC Medical Ethics 4 (1):1-10.
Deane-Peter Baker & James Pattison (2011). The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18.
Steven Lee (2012). Ethics and War: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
James Pattison (2008). Just War Theory and the Privatization of Military Force. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):143–162.
Robert Fine (2007). Cosmopolitanism. New York.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads16 ( #85,971 of 1,089,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?