Closing the gap between ideal and real behavior: Scientific vs. engineering approaches to normativity
Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):61 – 75 (2009)
| Abstract | Early normative studies of human behavior revealed a gap between the norms of practical rationality (what humans ought to do) and the actual human behavior (what they do). It has been suggested that, to close the gap between the descriptive and the normative, one has to revise norms of practical rationality according to the Quinean, engineering view of normativity. On this view, the norms must be designed such that they effectively account for behavior. I review recent studies of human perception which pursued normative modeling and which found good agreement between the normative prescriptions and the actual behavior. I make the case that the goals and methods of this work have been incompatible with those of the engineering approach. I argue that norms of perception and action are observer-independent properties of biological agents; the norms are discovered using methods of natural sciences rather than the norms are designed to fit the observed behavior. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBenoit Hardy-Vallée & Paul Thagard (2008). How to Play the Ultimatum Game: An Engineering Approach to Metanormativity. Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):173 – 192.
Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (2008). Normativity and Self-Interest in Scientific Research. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):71-81.
Krist Vaesen (2006). How Norms in Technology Ought to Be Interpreted. Techne 10 (1):117-133.
T. Jones (2010). Norms and Customs: Causally Important or Causally Impotent? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):399-432.
Chandra Sripada & Stephen Stich (2006). A Framework for the Psychology of Norms. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 2: Culture and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Marcin Miłkowski (2010). Making Naturalised Epistemology (Slightly) Normative. In Konrad Talmont-Kaminski & Marcin Miłkowski (eds.), Beyond Description. Naturalism and Normativity.
Kristin Andrews (2009). Understanding Norms Without a Theory of Mind. Inquiry 52 (5):433-448.
Javier Vázquez-Salceda, Huib Aldewereld, Davide Grossi & Frank Dignum (2008). From Human Regulations to Regulated Software Agents' Behavior. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):73-87.
David Danks & Frederick Eberhardt (2009). Explaining Norms and Norms Explained. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):86-87.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-08Total downloads23 ( #53,853 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
