A note on Woody on Dewey on Austin
Ethics 79 (4):303-308 (1969)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. W. Roxbee Cox (1955). Fitting and Matching: A Note on Professor Austin's "How to Talk". Analysis 16 (1):6 - 11.
Bernard Mayo (1963). A Note on Austin's Performative Theory of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):28 - 31.
Michael Durrant & Charles Sayward (1967). Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory. Analysis 27 (April):167-170.
Robert Schwartz (2004). To Austin or Not to Austin, That's the Disjunction. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Austin Duncan-Jones (1959). Note on the Mensuration of Intrinsic Value. Philosophy 34 (128):50-.
Keith Graham (1981). A Note on Reading Austin. Synthese 46 (1):143 - 147.
David Granger (2011). Editor's Note: History Repeating Itself. Education and Culture 27 (1).
James C. McCollum (2011). The Undiscovered Dewey: Religion, Morality, and the Ethos of Democracy (Review). Education and Culture 27 (2):101-105.
Susan Minot Woody (1968). The Theory of Sovereignty: Dewey Versus Austin. Ethics 78 (4):313-318.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,518 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
