Cambridge University Press (2004)
|Abstract||Joshua Gert presents a new account of normative practical reasons and the way in which they contribute to the rationality of action. He argues that, rather than simply "counting in favor of" action, normative reasons play two logically distinct roles--that of requiring action and that of justifying action. Gert's book will appeal to a range of readers interested in practical reasoning in particular, and moral theory more generally.|
|Keywords||Normativity (Ethics Decision making Moral and ethical aspects|
|Buy the book||$24.60 new (79% off) $24.60 used (79% off) $114.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1458.3.G47 2004|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Reisner (2011). Is There Reason to Be Theoretically Rational? In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
B. C. Postow (1999). Reasons for Action: Toward a Normative Theory and Meta-Level Criteria. Kluwer Academic.
Christian Miller (2008). Gert on Subjective Practical Rationality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):551 - 561.
Mark Rowlands (2006). The Normativity of Action. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):401-416.
Jonathan Dancy (2002). Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.
A. M. Viens (2008). Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Pp. XIII + 244. Utilitas 20 (2):246-248.
Benjamin Sachs (2008). Reasons and Requirements. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):73 - 83.
Mark van Roojen (2011). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):543-546.
Christian Miller (2005). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #88,058 of 551,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,370 of 551,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?