Cog Is to Us as We Are to God: A Response to Anne Foerst

Zygon 33 (2):263-269 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Foerst says that a robot must have human features if it is to learn to relate to human beings. She argues that the image of God (imago dei) represents no more than a promise of God to relate to us. In our view, however, the principle of embodied artificial intelligence (AI) in the robot suggests some kind of embodiedness of the image of God in human beings if they are to learn to relate to God.Foerst's description of how people react to a humanoid robot reads like Otto's description of the divine as mysterium fascinans et tremendum (awesome and alluring mystery). Her description makes robot‐human interaction seem more religious than human‐God interaction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embodied AI, Creation, and Cog.Anne Foerst - 1998 - Zygon 33 (3):455-461.
Selecting Barrenness - A response from Anne Williams.Anne Williams - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):29-31.
The attentional spotlight.Joanna J. Bryson - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (1):21-28.
God, Evil, and Evolution.Brian Zamulinski - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):201 - 217.
Response to Helm, Quinn, and Westphal.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (3):293-306.
Response to Stephen Houlgate.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):175-188.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books. Edited by Charles Billingsley.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
39 (#388,687)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?