|Abstract||As science, knowledge, and ideas evolve and are increased and refined, the branches of philosophy in charge of describing them should also be increased and refined. In this work we try to expand some ideas as a response to the recent approach from several sciences to complex systems. Because of their novelty, some of these ideas might require further refinement and may seem unfinished, but we need to start with something. Only with their propagation and feedback from critics they might be improved. We make a brief introduction to complex systems, for then defining abstraction levels. Abstraction levels represent simplicities and regularities in nature. We make an ontological distinction of absolute being and relative being, and then discuss issues on causality, metaphysics, and determinism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
H. P. P. Lotter (1999). The Complexity of Science. Koers 64 (4):499-520.
Meinard Kuhlmann (2011). Mechanisms in Dynamically Complex Systems. In Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Kara Vander Linden (2006). A Grounded Approach to the Study of Complex Systems. World Futures 62 (7):491 – 497.
Carlos Maldonado, The Study of Complex Systems and the Question Concerning the Philosophy of Knowledge.
Carlos Gershenson & Francis Heylighen (2004). How Can We Think the Complex? In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?