Capital punishment-"cruel and unusal"?: A retributivist response
Ethics 85 (1):75-79 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam A. Edmundson (1984). Death Penalties: A Review of Raoul Berger, Death Penalties. [REVIEW] Duke Law Journal 1984:624-29.
Nathan Hanna (2008). Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 27 (2):123-150.
George Schedler (2011). Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Daniel McDermott (2001). A Retributivist Argument Against Capital Punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (3):317–333.
Thomas A. Long (1973). Capital Punishment-"Cruel and Unusual"? Ethics 83 (3):214-223.
Anthony P. Roark (1999). Retribution, the Death Penalty, and the Limits of Human Judgment. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):57-68.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Thom Brooks (2004). Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads107 ( #5,302 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,091 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
