Explanatory reduction, conceptual analysis, and conceivability arguments about the mind

Noûs 36 (1):22-49 (2002)
My aim here is threefold: to show that conceptual facts play a more significant role in justifying explanatory reductions than most of the contributors to the current debate realize; to furnish an account of that role, and to trace the consequences of this account for conceivability arguments about the mind
Keywords Conceivability  Conceptual Analysis  Explanation  Metaphysics  Mind  Reduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00359
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,774
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Gordon Prescott Barnes (2007). Necessity and Apriority. Philosophical Studies 132 (3):495 - 523.
Louis deRosset (2010). Reference and Response. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99999 (1):1-18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Andrew Botterell (2001). Conceiving What is Not There. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (8):21-42.
Mircea Dumitru (2008). Conceivability and Possibility. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:53-60.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

199 ( #9,218 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

22 ( #38,425 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.