Knowledge on the horizon: A phenomenological inquiry into the “framing” of Rodney King [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 29 (3):295 - 315 (2006)
Using the 1991 police beating of Rodney King as case study, this paper draws on Husserlian phenomenology to establish a coherentist account of knowledge as situated with respect to its concrete circumstances of production (e.g., social, cultural, historical, political). I take as my point of departure Gail Weiss's phenomenological investigation into the jury's assessment of evidence in the "Rodney King incident," and in particular, her interest in Husserl's conception of the "horizon" as a structure of consciousness that mediates what is present in perceptual awareness. Making use of Anthony Steinbock's work on Husserlian phenomenological method — drawn from his extensive study of Husserl's unpublished manuscripts — I develop an epistemological framework that treats knowledge claims as inextricably bound to the horizons of meaning from which they arise, and provides standards of epistemic responsibility pertaining to an agent's "framing" of evidence
|Keywords||coherentist epistemology horizon interpretation King lifeworld phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hugh Rodney King (1949). Whitehead's Doctrine of Causal Efficacy. Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):85-100.
Steven Crowell (2005). "Phenomenology is the Poetic Essence of Philosophy": Maurice Natanson on the Rule of Metaphor. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):270-289.
George Heffernan (2009). On Husserl's Remark That “[s]Elbst Eine Sich Als Apodiktisch Ausgebende Evidenz Kann Sich Als Täuschung Enthüllen …” (XVII 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (1):15-43.
Risto Heiskala (2011). The Meaning of Meaning in Sociology. The Achievements and Shortcomings of Alfred Schutz's Phenomenological Sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):231-246.
Søren Overgaard (2003). Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Ronald McIntyre & David Woodruff Smith (1989). Theory of Intentionality. In William R. McKenna & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America.
Douglas W. McLaughlin & Cesar R. Torres (2011). Sweet Tension and its Phenomenological Description: Sport, Intersubjectivity and Horizon. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):270 - 284.
Amie L. Thomasson (2005). First-Person Knowledge in Phenomenology. In David Woodruff Smith & Amie L. Thomasson (eds.), Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 115--138.
Walter Hopp (2008). Husserl, Phenomenology, and Foundationalism. Inquiry 51 (2):194 – 216.
Walter Hopp (2009). Phenomenology and Fallibility. Husserl Studies 25 (1):1-14.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #178,836 of 1,101,646 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,468 of 1,101,646 )
How can I increase my downloads?