Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1988)
This volume is a revised, enlarged, and broadened version of Gert's classic 1970 book, The Moral Rules. Advocating an approach he terms "morality as impartial rationality," Gert here presents a full discussion of his moral theory, adding a wealth of new illuminating detail to his analysis of the concepts--rationality/irrationality, good/evil, and impartiality--by which he defines morality. He constructs a "moral system" that includes rules prohibiting the kinds of actions that cause evil, procedures for determining when violation of the rules is permitted, and ideals which encourage actions that prevent or relieve suffering. To be valid, Gert argues, any such system must be "a public system that applies to all rational persons." The book concludes with a discussion of medical ethics, demonstrating the link between moral theory and its application to real moral problems.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$29.30 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1012.G45 1988|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter J. Arnold (1992). Sport as a Valued Human Practice: A Basis for the Consideration of Some Moral Issues in Sport. Journal of Philosophy of Education 26 (2):237–255.
Deni Elliott & Charles Culver (1992). Defining and Analyzing Journalistic Deception. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (2):69 – 84.
Christopher Meyers (2011). Reappreciating W. D. Ross: Naturalizing Prima Facie Duties and a Proposed Method. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (4):316-331.
Mark Timmons (1991). On the Epistemic Status of Considered Moral Judgments. Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):97-129.
Kerry Brace & Leon VandeCreek (1991). The Justification of Paternalistic Actions in Psychotherapy. Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):87 – 103.
Similar books and articles
Logi Gunnarsson (2000). Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier. Cambridge University Press.
Jean Chambers (2001). A Cybernetic Theory of Morality and Moral Autonomy. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):177-192.
Tobias Gössling (2003). The Price of Morality. An Analysis of Personality, Moral Behaviour, and Social Rules in Economic Terms. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1/2):121 - 131.
Brad Hooker (2010). When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate? In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oup Oxford.
John W. Hennessey & Bernard Gert (1985). Moral Rules and Moral Ideals: A Useful Distinction in Business and Professional Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):105 - 115.
Andrew Alexandra & Seumas Miller (2009). Ethical Theory, “Common Morality,” and Professional Obligations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):69-80.
William H. Hay (1990). Book Review:Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. Bernard Gert. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (2):411-.
Bernard Gert (2004/2007). Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press.
Bernard Gert (1998). Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?