Martial Bliss: War and Peace in Popular Science Robotics [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):339-354 (2011)
In considering how to best deploy robotic systems in public and private sectors, we must consider what individuals will expect from the robots with which they interact. Public awareness of robotics—as both military machines and domestic helpers—emerges out of a braided stream composed of science fiction and popular science. These two genres influence news media, government and corporate spending, and public expectations. In the Euro-American West, both science fiction and popular science are ambivalent about the military applications for robotics, and thus we can expect their readers to fear the dangers posed by advanced robotics while still eagerly anticipating the benefits to be accrued through them. The chief pop science authors in robotics and artificial intelligence have a decidedly apocalyptic bent and have thus been described as leaders in a social movement called "Apocalyptic AI." In one form or another, such authors look forward to a transcendent future in which machine life succeeds human life, thanks to the march of evolutionary progress. The apocalyptic promises of popular robotics presume that presently exponential growth in computing will continue indefinitely, producing a "Singularity." During the Singularity, technological progress will be so rapid that undreamt of changes will take place on earth, the most important of which will be the evolutionary succession of human beings by massively intelligent robots and the "uploading" of human consciousness into computer bodies. This supposedly inevitable transition into post-biological life looms across the entire scope of pop robotics and artificial intelligence (AI), and it is from beneath that shadow that all popular books engage the military and the ethics of warfare. Creating a just future will require that we transcend the apocalyptic discourse of pop science and establish an ethical approach to researching and deploying robots, one that emphasizes human rather than robot welfare; doing so will require the collaboration of social scientists, humanists, and scientists
|Keywords||Apocalyptic AI Artificial intelligence Ethics Hans Moravec Military Morality Popular science Ray Kurzweil Robotics Science fiction War|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Geraci (2010). Apocalyptic Ai: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality. OUP Usa.
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Marvin L. Minsky (1994). Will Robots Inherit the Earth? Scientific American (Oct).
Hans Moravec (1979). Today's Computers, Intelligent Machines and Our Future. Analog 99 (2):59-84.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcus Schulzke (2013). Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility. Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):203-219.
Similar books and articles
Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) (2011). War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present. Routledge.
Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) (2012). War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present: The Third Annual Conference of the Israel Heritage Department Ariel, Israel. Routledge.
Mehdi Faridzadeh (ed.) (2004). Philosophies of Peace and Just War in Greek Philosophy and Religions of Abraham: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Global Scholarly Publications.
Nick Mansfield (2008). No Peace Without War, No War Without Peace : Deconstructing War. In Nicole Anderson & Katrina Schlunke (eds.), Cultural Theory in Everyday Practice. Oxford University Press
Howard Williams (2012). Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jost Dülffer & Robert Frank (eds.) (2009). Peace, War and Gender From Antiquity to the Present: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Klartext.
Guy Theodore Wrench (1926). The Causes of War and Peace. London, W. Heinemann Ltd..
Heinz Duchhardt (1981). War and Peace in Peace Treaties. A Universal-Historical Study on the Bases and Formal Elements of the Conclusion of Peace. Philosophy and History 14 (2):170-171.
Henri Gigon (1935). Ethics of Peace and War. London, Burns, Oates & Washbourne Ltd..
Claudia Card (1996). Rape as a Weapon of War. Hypatia 11 (4):5 - 18.
Ellen Y. Zhang (2012). Weapons Are Nothing but Ominous Instruments: The Daodejing's View on War and Peace. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):473-502.
Jack S. Levy (2007). Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. Routledge.
Nick Mansfield (2008). Theorizing War: From Hobbes to Badiou. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2011-07-13
Total downloads15 ( #161,941 of 1,699,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?