David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1998)
This book offers the fullest and most sophisticated account of Gert's influential moral theory, a model first articulated in the classic work The Moral Rules: A New Rational Foundation for Morality, published in 1970. In this final revision, Gert makes clear that the moral rules are only one part of an informal system that does not provide unique answers to every moral question but does always provide a range of morally acceptable options. A new chapter on reasons includes an account of what makes one reason better than another and a second new chapter is devoted to the question of justifying violations of the rules. Moral impartiality, the moral ideals, and virtue and vice, are all treated in greater detail. Throughout, Gert attempts to answer all of the challenges that his work has provoked.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.93 used (94% off) $17.99 new (68% off) $56.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1012.G45 1998|
|ISBN(s)||9780195122565 0195122550 0195176901 0195122569 0195176898 9780195176902|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Timothy Hsiao (2015). In Defense of Eating Meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):277-291.
Robert L. Simon (2000). Internalism and Internal Values in Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):1-16.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Thalia Wheatley (2014). Are Moral Judgments Unified? Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):451-474.
Justin Sytsma & Edouard Machery (2012). The Two Sources of Moral Standing. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):303-324.
Geoffrey P. Goodwin & John M. Darley (2010). The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):161-188.
Similar books and articles
John W. Hennessey & Bernard Gert (1985). Moral Rules and Moral Ideals: A Useful Distinction in Business and Professional Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):105 - 115.
Bernard Gert (2004/2007). Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Alexandra & Seumas Miller (2009). Ethical Theory, “Common Morality,” and Professional Obligations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):69-80.
William H. Hay (1990). Book Review:Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. Bernard Gert. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (2):411-.
Bernard Gert (1999). Common Morality and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
K. A. Wallace (2009). Common Morality and Moral Reform. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Bernard Gert (2006). Bioethics: A Systematic Approach. Oxford University Press.
Logi Gunnarsson (2000). Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier. Cambridge University Press.
Bernard Gert (1988). Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #79,315 of 1,792,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #170,662 of 1,792,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?