Normative strength and the balance of reasons
Philosophical Review 116 (4):533-562 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAttila Tanyi (2006). An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons Model. Dissertation, Central European University
Douglas W. Portmore (2011). Imperfect Reasons and Rational Options. Noûs 46 (1):24-60.
Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
Earl Conee (2009). Peerage. Episteme 6 (3):313-323.
Joshua Gert (2004). Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Cambridge University Press.
Daan Evers (2010). The End-Relational Theory of 'Ought' and the Weight of Reasons. Dialectica 64 (3):405-417.
Donald C. Hubin (1999). Converging on Values. Analysis 59 (264):355–361.
Daan Evers (2011). The Standard-Relational Theory of 'Ought' and the Oughtistic Theory of Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):131-147.
Joshua Gert (2005). A Functional Role Analysis of Reasons. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):353 - 378.
Joshua Gert (2003). Requiring and Justifying: Two Dimensions of Normative Strength. Erkenntnis 59 (1):5 - 36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads53 ( #19,406 of 549,546 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,251 of 549,546 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
