No (social) construction without (meta-)representation: Modular mechanisms as a basis for the capacity to acquire an understanding of mind
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):106-107 (2004)
Theories that propose a modular basis for developing a “theory of mind” have no problem accommodating social interaction or social environment factors into either the learning process, or into the genotypes underlying the growth of the neurocognitive modules. Instead, they can offer models which constrain and hence explain the mechanisms through which variations in social interaction affect development. Cognitive models of both competence and performance are critical to evaluating the basis of correlations between variations in social interaction and performance on mental state reasoning tasks.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Amir Amin Yazdi, Tim P. German, Margaret Anne Defeyter & Michael Siegal (2006). Competence and Performance in Belief-Desire Reasoning Across Two Cultures: The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth About False Belief? Cognition 100 (2):343-368.
Similar books and articles
Michael K. Cundall (2006). Rethinking the Divide: Modules and Central Systems. Philosophia 34 (4):379-393.
Michael Siegal (2004). Social Understanding and the Cognitive Architecture of Theory of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):122-122.
Claudia Lorena García (2007). Cognitive Modularity, Biological Modularity and Evolvability. Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution and Cognition (KLI) 2 (1):62-73.
Nina Howe (2004). The Sibling Relationship as a Context for the Development of Social Understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):110-111.
Janet Wilde Astington (2004). What's New About Social Construction? Distinct Roles Needed for Language and Communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):96-97.
Derek E. Montgomery (2004). Challenging Theory-Theory Accounts of Social Understanding: Where is the Social Constructivist Advantage? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):118-119.
Peter Carruthers (2004). Practical Reasoning in a Modular Mind. Mind and Language 19 (3):259-278.
John Bolender (2003). The Genealogy of the Moral Modules. Minds and Machines 13 (2):233-255.
Hanne de Jaegher, Ezequiel di Paolo & Shaun Gallagher (2010). Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10):441-447.
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #196,341 of 1,938,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #163,174 of 1,938,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?