Graduate studies at Western
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):233-256 (2004)
|Abstract||In this paper, I explore the origins of the ‘problem of universals’. I argue that the problem has come to be badly formulated and that consideration of it has been impeded by falsely supposing that Platonic Forms were ever intended as an alternative to Aristotelian universals. In fact, the role that Forms are supposed by Plato to fulfill is independent of the function of a universal. I briefly consider the gradual mutation of the problem in the Academy, in Alexander of Aphrodisias, and among some of the major Neoplatonic commentators on Aristotle, including Porphyry and Boethius.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arnold Cusmariu (1979). On an Aristotelian Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):51 – 58.
S. Gibbons & C. Legg (2013). Higher-Order One–Many Problems in Plato's Philebus and Recent Australian Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):119 - 138.
Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43-55.
R. W. Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43 - 55.
Fraser MacBride (2002). The Problem of Universals and the Limits of Truth-Making. Philosophical Papers 31 (1):27-37.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000). What is the Problem of Universals? Mind 109 (434):255-273.
Riin Sirkel (2011). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and its Problems. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #18,848 of 739,391 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,391 )
How can I increase my downloads?